Real opportunities: how private capital can access real estate
Webinar |
Supporting Private Capital Managers
Tailored solutions for the private capital industry.
Spotlight case study
/Passle/5a1c2144b00e80131c20b495/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-04-13-25-57-887-68b993655a0e7c387a35c7db.png)
6 minute read
In this week’s update: Listed companies to be required to publish net zero transition plans, IPEV consults on revisions to its Valuation Guidelines, ISS consults on its 2022 voting policies, the International Sustainability Standards Board is established and the ONS publishes UK gender pay gap data for 2021.
The Government has confirmed that, as part of its plan for the UK to become the world's first Net Zero-aligned Financial Centre, it intends to require listed companies (among other organisations) to publish net zero transition plans.
Under the proposals, a listed company would be required to publish a transition plan setting out how it intends to adapt as the world transitions to a low-carbon economy. The plan would set out:
The obligation would apply on a "comply or explain" basis. A company that fails to publish a transition plan would need to explain why it has not done so. Over time, the obligation would move away from a "comply or explain" basis and become a mandatory disclosure.
The Government acknowledges that there is currently no commonly agreed standard for a high-quality transition plan. It therefore intends to establish a Transition Plan Taskforce to develop a "gold standard" for transition plans. The Taskforce will work with the Financial Conduct Authority.
The new obligation would appear to sit alongside the new regime, details of which the Government published last week, requiring a wider range of business organisations to make mandatory climate-related financial disclosures broadly in line with the recommendations of the Financial Stability Board's Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). For more information on that regime, see our previous Corporate Law Update.
The Government has confirmed that it is not proposing to impose mandatory net-zero commitments, instead leaving listed companies and their shareholders to decide how to achieve this.
Finally, the Government has also confirmed that it is not proposing to prohibit investments in carbon-intensive activities. Rather, its aim is to increase transparency and accountability about actions listed companies are planning to take to align with the transition to net zero, leaving shareholders and the market to decide whether published plans are adequate or credible.
The International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Board (IPEV) has published the timeline for the next review of its Valuation Guidelines.
The IPEV Guidelines set out recommendations on valuing private capital investments. The Guidelines are intended to represent best practice where investments are reported at "fair value" and to help investors in private capital funds make better economic decisions.
IPEV updates the Guidelines periodically to incorporate changes to accounting standards and ensure they continue to reflect best practice when valuing investments. The Guidelines were last updated in 2018 as part of IPEV's triennial review.
IPEV is not planning on making significant changes to the Guidelines and so has issued a general call for feedback. Concepts that IPEV proposes to incorporate in the next version of the Guidelines include guidance provided during the Covid-19 pandemic and further guidance on valuing early-stage venture investments.
IPEV has asked for comments by 28 January 2022.
Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) has launched its annual consultation on changes to its voting policies. The voting policies inform how ISS will recommend that individual shareholders vote in relation to key resolutions of publicly traded companies.
In relation specifically to the UK and Ireland, ISS is proposing the following.
In addition, in relation to all markets, ISS is proposing to introduce new policy recommendations in relation to say on climate proposals. ISS will consider say on climate proposals on a case-by-case basis and issue a voting recommendation in each case after assessing the proposal against specific criteria. For these purposes, ISS distinguishes between two types of proposal (each with their own set of assessment criteria):
ISS' proposed position on say on climate votes contrasts with that of proxy advisor Glass Lewis, which intends to approach say on climate votes with caution and, pending a degree of standardisation, will generally recommend voting against proposals to provide shareholders with an annual say on climate.
Stay up to date with our latest insights, events and updates – direct to your inbox.
Browse our people by name, team or area of focus to find the expert that you need.